The last part of a trilogy (VALIS; the Divine Invasion). Book blurb: “… An anguished, learned, and very moving investigation of the paradoxes of belief.”
Philip K. Dick writes in a manner than convinces me that the protagonist is real. As in, the protagonist comes across as a very real character. In fact, all the characters seem convincing.
Timothy Archer is an Episcopal bishop. Apparently a well-known and respected one, though also known for his controversial views of church doctrines.
The book is told from the perspective of the Tim’s daughter-in-law, Angel Archer, ranging from the basis of Christianity to related philosophies. There is a find, which Tim suspects that could predate Jesus and worries that it would shake the foundation of the religion.
Through the characters and mostly through Angel’s thoughts, we are introduced to diverse subjects from religion to mental illness to Indian philosophy.
And in the end, the one person who appeared the most sane and rational, Angel, turns out to be also someone who has sort of deceived herself in how/ who she chooses to believe.
Early on, we are told of Tim’s death. The title alludes to how Tim appears to be ‘re-born’ (or Transmigrated, to be more exact) to Bill, who is Kirsten’s schizophrenic son.
It reminded me of Persig’s “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”, the kind of philosophical context surrounding the characters and their settings. E.g. The protagonist’s conversation with Bill (the schizophrenic son of Kisten — the woman having a relationship with the protagonist’s father-in-law).
a nice quote: P31. “… If you wish to conquer us, show us love not scorn. Faith moves mountains, love moves human hearts. The people opposing you are people, not things. Your enemy is not men but ignorant men. Don’t confuse the men with their ignorance.”


Jul 09, 2010 @ 00:31:12
GREAT book! thanks for the review….
Jul 09, 2010 @ 14:01:55
Thanks for the comment, Joachin. I must say this book isn’t what I expected Philip K. Dick to write about. Then again, I’ve only read one or two of his works.
Jul 09, 2010 @ 14:30:40
haha — yes, it’s not a work of sci-fi AND comes really late in his career at the pinnacles of his obsessing with various religions… i.e. he wrote multiple thousands of pages (unpublished to this point) conversations with God and the such. if you want more “mainstream” PKD, stick to his pre-1975 works — of his later works, the only one which really really resonates with me is A Scanner Darkly.
Jul 10, 2010 @ 11:44:39
OK, I’m heading over to my public library and see if I can get hold of “A Scanner Darkly”! thanks for the recommendation
Jul 11, 2010 @ 00:46:12
Also check out the ‘A Scanner Darkly’ (dir. Linklater) movie with Robert Downey Jr., Robert Downey Jr., Woody Harrelson, and Winona Ryder — it’s actually quite good. Visually quite bizarre….
Jul 11, 2010 @ 00:47:06
* and, sadly, Keanu Reeves (but he’s quite good actually – surprisingly)
Aug 10, 2010 @ 15:31:07
Hey Joachim, I read the book. Though I’ve to say much of it eludes me. Guess Philip K. Dick’s style isn’t up my alley. Will post the notes later. Thanks for the referral though.
Jan 11, 2011 @ 22:15:18